Dreams for Kids: Holiday for Hope

Dreams for Kids is proud to celebrate its 21st Anniversary!

Here at DFK, our mission is to empower at-risk youth and those with disabilities through dynamic leadership programs and life-changing activities that inspire them to fearlessly pursue their dreams and compassionately change the world. Our journey began on Christmas Eve, 1989, in a tiny room of a small homeless shelter in Chicago and each year we have found more children who are desperate for hope. For the last 17 years, our holiday outreach for children in need has been the largest event of its kind in Illinois. This year we will be joined by groups in over 30 countries as Dreams for Kids hosts the largest holiday celebration for homeless and underprivileged children in the world – Holiday for Hope.

Our main event in Chicago will be held on December 18th, 2010, from 9:00am to 4:00pm, at IBEW Local #134 Hall, 600 W. Washington, Chicago, IL. There will be two participant shifts this year. You will be assigned to attend either a morning or an afternoon shift, which will be determined at a later date.

Space is very limited and will fill up quickly. It is essential that you contact us as soon as possible to schedule your group. We require the names, gender, ages of children (remember the party is for kids 7 years and under), and the number and names of chaperones expected to attend. Additionally, each child will need a waiver filled out for them. This year only those children who are pre- registered will be allowed to attend, which is the only way that we can guarantee that every child receives a gift and there is enough food for everyone. We must have the names of all attendees and the names, ages and gender of all children prior to December 10th, 2010.

In keeping with the Dreams for Kids mission of empowering youth, all children invited to attend Holiday for Hope are required to participate in a community outreach of their choosing to take place after our event. As each child learns the valuable lesson of paying forward the gift of generosity communities across the world will benefit. Imagine the collective global impact of neighborhood cleanups, visits to retirement facilities, or even fundraising for local or global projects. Our staff is ready to help you with ideas and we will feature all efforts across the world that will transform a single day of charity into a powerful unbroken circle of giving.

Please contact Shelly at 312-729-5404 or e-mail me at shellyg@dreamsforkids.org. We look forward to seeing you at the Dreams for Kids Holiday for Hope Celebration!


To Learn More About Dreams for Kids Check Out This Video!!!!

http://player.vimeo.com/video/13914757

Keke Palmer from Dreams for Kids on Vimeo.

Web Address:

http://dreamsforkids.org/

The Power of One

THE POWER OF ONE IS THE POWER TO DO SOMETHING……ANYTHING

London Mayor, Boris Johnson, Cuts Funds to Black History Month


In February this year I was disgusted to read that Boris Johnson, the current Mayor of London, had slashed funding for big multi-cultural events while putting £100,000 into a new venture to celebrate America. Here is a portion from the Guardian report:

Figures seen by the Guardian show that the London mayor cut funding for Black History Month, a series of events staged in October to celebrate black culture in the capital, from £132,000 to £10,000, though city hall insists the previous figure was £76,000. Africa Day’s £100,000 grant from the London Development Agency was axed completely and a decision to cut funding for the St Patrick’s Day celebration was roundly criticised last year. Funding for Jewish events was halved to £50,000.

Johnson was accused of “subsidising wealthy Americans” after the Guardian reported earlier this year that the development agency, the mayor’s economic arm, had allocated £75,000 to USA Day. It emerged yesterday that the mayor has agreed to top this up with a further £25,000 from the Greater London Authority (GLA), bringing the total to £100,000.

This information clearly demonstrates where Boris Johnson’s loyalties lie and, to be honest, do not help the perception of him being a racist, elitist, out-of-touch, suck-up Conservative.
The 2007 estimates for the number of Black people in London (including those with a mixed black heritage) were 12.1% and 12% were Irish. A study in 2002 found there were 195,000 Jewish people living in London, the 13th highest city in the world.
As for the number of American people living in London? The 2001 census recorded 44,622. Jamaica alone had 80,319 while Ireland had 157,285.
So now we have a few facts, lets step back and look at this decision:
The Mayor of London decides to cut funding to celebrate Black, Irish and Jewish events, with some funding being cut altogether, despite the fact that these three cultural groups make up a substantial portion of the population of London, a city that PRIDES itself on its cultural diversity and loves to celebrate it. He then grants £100,000 to a culture which in 2001 made up 0.85% OF THE LONDON POPULATION.

The Guardian says: Johnson has previously defended the move as part of a drive to attract more American tourists to the capital

So is Mr Johnson suggesting that Americans won’t go anywhere that doesn’t big up their country? Correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t going holiday suggest you want to explore a new and different culture rather than celebrate your own? How many Americans sit at home and think ‘oh I wish I could celebrate America… I know, I’LL GO TO THE UK! THEY HAVE USA DAY!’?
Responding to the outrage of this decision, a spokesman for the mayor said:
“Events must have local and community support if they are to add value and make a proper contribution to community cohesion in London, and as has been seen with the celebrations for St Patrick’s Day and a new Jewish cultural festival that is coming up, it is possible for communities themselves to create greatly enhanced events, but with reduced GLA funding. The GLA does not own Black History Month or Africa Day, but we would hope community groups would be able to develop programmes that mark these in a similar way.”

This is possibly the angriest a Tory politician has ever made me – OH WAIT STRIKE THAT, NOW THEY’RE INCREASING UNIVERSITY TUITION FEES, THE ELITIST BASTARDS! – and I cannot wait for the Mayoral Election when I can do my bit in helping kick Boris Johnson the hell out.
Robyn
To read the full article, click here
Image from:

Sep. 11, 2010: 9/11 Post


I can remember the exactly where I was at on Sep. 11, 2001. I was in elementary school where there was an unimaginable silence in the air. My teacher came from a staff meeting in regards how to successfully deliver such news to young students. My teacher then told us that the World Trade Centers in New York City was been crashed into. I was not really affected by it, primarily because I did not know the full extent on the damage. When I arrived home, I turned on the television and realized the true extent of the bombing.

Now 9 years later, I will never forget where I was on Sep. 11, 2010. I was fortunate enough to be able to travel to New York City. I travelled throughout the city using the public transportation stop. When I got on the train, it was full of people; however, as I got to the stop “World Trade Center” it was virtually empty. When I arrived to the actual site, it was quite interesting. There were actually a lot of people there taking photographs and reflecting. A thing that surprised me was that were actual people there saying that Sep. 11 was a coordinated government attack, which the United States government had actually planned for such an event to occur.

As I walked further contemplating what to do next besides take photos, I suddenly remembered Sep. 11, 2010 is the anti-Islamic center protest. I decided to go there strictly to observe the atmosphere; I was a tad bit unprepared for the atmosphere. Since I did not have a clue where I was going, I just followed the noise of a crowd. When I was finally able to see the crowd, I stood in disbelief that there were so many people here to protest an Islamic center. You could cut through the tension with a knife. There was a man who firmly believed that what he believed was the truth, so much so, that he decided to tell a Muslim man “Shari’a is shit”. I could not believe it since everyone can be entitled to his or her religion.

There were tons of people debating whether or not the Islamic center should be built. In addition, there were protestors who protested the protestors against the Islamic center. People began shouting and yelling at each other. As the rally closed those, who were against the Islamic center started chanting “No More Mosque!” Members from the crowd then began to push and shove the supporters of the Islamic center. In some cases, the supporters were spat on. I could not believe what I was seeing, after tons of maneuvering through crowds and people I was finally able to board a train back to New Jersey.

Feel free to look at more photos:

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=293076&id=365466194415

Michael Jackson’s Earth Song

Due to the recent events, we have decided to post this in reminder of our humanity:

http://www.youtube.com/v/XAi3VTSdTxU&hl=en_US&feature=player_detailpage&version=3

Who is Confucius? The teachings, politics and philosophy.

Confucius was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher who continues to have a profound effect on politics and philosophy thousands of years after his death. His philosophy emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity. Confucius sought to build a great, harmonious and humanistic society. Confucius’s works are studied by scholars in China and many other Asian countries such as Korea, Japan and Vietnam. Also, on this day many of these countries hold a traditional ceremony for his birthday.
The tradition that bears his name – “Confucianism” (Chinese: Rujia) – ultimately traces itself to the sayings and biographical fragments recorded in the text known as the Analects (Chinese: Lunyu).
Confucius represented his teachings as lessons transmitted from antiquity. He claimed that he was “a transmitter and not a maker” and that all he did reflected his “reliance on and love for the ancients.” Rather than trying to build a systematic ideology or establish rules for society, Confucius wanted his disciples to think for themselves and study the outside world. He disparages those who have faith in natural understanding or intuition and argues that the only real understanding of a subject comes from long and careful study. Study, for Confucius, means finding a good teacher and imitating his words and deeds. He taught through personal exemplification rather than explicit rules of behaviour. His moral teachings emphasized self-cultivation, emulation of moral exemplars, and the attainment of skilled judgment rather than knowledge of rules. His ethical ideals and methods are conveyed indirectly, for example:
When the stables were burnt down, on returning from court, Confucius said, ‘Was anyone hurt?’ He did not ask about the horses.
Analects X.11, tr. Arthur Waley
Which teaches that you should value human beings over property and it leads readers to reflect on what their response would have been: would they have asked about the horses or the humans?
In times of division, chaos and endless wars, Confucius wanted to unify the world and bestow peace and prosperity on the people. He proposes a new political agenda: a revival of a unified royal state, whose rulers would succeed to power on the basis of their moral merits instead of lineage; these would be rulers devoted to their people, striving for personal and social perfection. Such a ruler would spread his own virtues to the people instead of imposing proper behavior with laws and rules. Confucius thought that a ruler who had to resort to force had already failed as a ruler:
“Your job is to govern, not to kill”
Confucius’ political thought is based upon his ethical thought. He argues that the best government is one that rules through “rites” and people’s natural morality, rather than by using bribery and coercion. While he supported the idea of government by an all-powerful and wise leader, his ideas contained a number of elements to limit the power of rulers. He argued for according language with truth and placed great importance on honesty.
Confucius’ social philosophy focused on the concept of ren, “compassion” or “loving others.” Cultivating or practising compassion for others meant deprecating yourself which meant avoiding deceitful or manipulative behaviour, or being false and giving people the idea that you are wonderful, thus self-aggrandizing yourself. For Confucius, such concern for others is demonstrated through the practice of forms of the Golden Rule:
“What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others;”
“Since you yourself desire standing then help others achieve it, since you yourself desire success then help others attain it.”
(Lunyu 12.2, 6.30).
He saw devotion to parents and older siblings as the most basic form of putting the interests of others before your own and teaches that this practise of unselfish concern for others can be accomplished only by those who have learned self-discipline.
Confucius’ goal wass to create gentlemen who carried themselves with grace, spoke correctly and demonstrated great integrity. His strong dislike of the selfish “petty men,” whose clever talk and pretentious manner win them an audience, is reflected passages of his teachings.
While many people may think of Indian or Chinese philosophy as intuitionistic or mystical Confucianism has been said to be a hundred times more rationalistic than Western philosophy. It is thought that Confucianism had considerable importance on European thinkers of the period, particularly among the Deists and other philosophical groups of the Enlightenment who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into Western civilization.
While Confucius idea’s of paternalism seem to embody conservatism, his ideas of rulers for the people remind me greatly of the early liberal enlightment thinkers giving him an almost middle ground political philosophy. Unfortunately, morals have not played a very important part in politics for a very, very long time and many of the thoughts in Confucianism could never work in today’s society. Nevertheless Confucianism provides such a faith in human nature and strong virtues to strive towards, it is no wonder that Confucianism is now one of the religions of China.
Information from:

Tourist Stereotypes And The Dangers

The fat Southern American couple that can’t pronounce the names of the sights. The Japanese tourist group avidly taking photos of everything. The hippy travelling students that leave mess and noise in their wake. Tourist stereotypes are extremely common, often being endorsed in films and advertisements. But there is a darker side to these stereotypes that many of us don’t realise.

Let’s take a closer look at the American tourist stereotype, for example. From having a look on Google, it seems the common stereotype is for American tourists to be loud, obnoxious, ignorant, unappreciative and with a sense of superiority. Oh, and of course they are all overweight. There are web pages dedicated to helping American’s keep themselves from appearing like tourists with advice like “be quiet!” “don’t compare everything to the USA” and “Leave your baseball hats, backpack, fanny pack and water bottles at home”.
This is the problem with stereotypes; they all tend to be negative. As stereotypes often become our common associations to a particular group, we therefore develop negative thoughts about the group as a whole. When looking at stereotypes as a whole, this is one of the biggest arguments I can think of against them but in particular to tourists, when the locals have these associations, one emotion tends to crop up wherever the tourists do: irritation. We become irritated that these people are in our country, often their pure appearance or the fact that they are clearly foreign is enough to piss us off. This in turn leads to tourists thinking that the population of that country are rude and horrible, leading to a stereotype of that population and the vicious cycle continues.
The example that springs to mind here is France and the English. I have heard many English people complain that the French are extremely rude to English people who visit France. On the other side however, the French find it extremely rude the way the English behave while in France, with stereotypes of treating the French who can’t speak English as if they are stupid with big hand gestures and speaking very slowly still in English (as if that will somehow help the French understand). Ultimately the whole problem stems from a misunderstanding of each other that has been exaggerated and cemented through a stereotype.
In future, even if a tourist does appear to fit a stereotype, don’t let this cycle continue. Walk up to that overweight American in the brightly coloured shirt and just let them know that in your country the handshake is not used or most people don’t speak English or the name of that tourist attraction is pronounced this way not that. By politely educating each other and generally just being kind to one another perhaps we can exchange these negative stereotypes for positive ones. Its worth a shot, right?

Neither Black nor White – The Confusion of Being Mixed Race

In today’s world, our race or ethnicity has an enormous effect on our personal identity. Races have histories, celebrations, countries of origin, cuisines, music styles and more. Mixed race, or biracial people have ancestries which come from different races. Technically, we are all multiracial as people boast of being “1/3 Italian, 1/5 French with a Grandma from Scotland” but the term mixed race/biracial refers to those with parents from two different races.

As racism declines and globalism increases, it is inevitable that the number of mixed race people around the world continues to grow. It is still, however, uncommon. In 2006, biracial people made up 2% of the United States population, 1.5% of the Canadian population. In 2005 in the UK, 3.4% of newborn babies were mixed race and by 2020 the mixed race population is expected to be Britain’s largest ethnic minority group with the highest growth rate. There is an estimated population of Anglo-Indians is 600,000, with the majority living in Britain and India. 2.4% of the 2007 Singapore population were mixed race. Although the most common mixed ethnicity is some form of black and white, the combinations are endless as the different kinds of races are endless.
Even though being from two different races means you have two different cultures to enjoy, the difficulty comes from the fact that technically, you are neither of those two races either. In a sense, mixed race people are born with a completely blank slate and they can create their own identities. Take me, Robyn, for example. My mother is black Caribbean and my father is white British. While my skin is brown, I am not black but neither am I white. I am both and yet neither and this fact is dealt with differently by each mixed race individual.
I have never connected myself with either the white or black cultures and my race has never even really been an important factor to me. I’ve always found that its other people who are more concerned about my race. 50% of the time people ask me “where are you from?” and, although I always know what they mean, I like to reply “Harrow” or “London” so they then ask “no, I mean like what country originally?” Then I explain my two different parents. The other 50% like to take a guess and BOY have there been some guesses. I’ve been mistaken for Indian, Greek, Middle Eastern, Native American, all of the Caribbean islands and just about all of the countries in South America. The only trouble I’ve ever found with being mixed race is when I am unable to fit in because I’m not a certain race. All over the world there are people who only hang out with and date those of their own race. One such experience when I was a teenager was when my Indian best friend ditched me to join a group of Indian girls just like her. I couldn’t appreciate or join in the Indian culture and it must have gotten tiresome for her. Losing a friend because I was mixed race was difficult to accept but for every Ying there is a Yang: there are many men in this world who specifically find mixed race girls HOT. Don’t know what it is, but they do! And I have never again found any trouble with my friends and have friends of all different races from all over the world. I also only take my race seriously when I get called Half-caste, the word I hate most in the whole world. I am NOT half of anything. Because mixed race people are so uncommon and the term half-caste has never been widely recognised as a racist term, people often use it in a completely neutral manner, not realising how offensive it can be. Think of it this way: the term “coloured” for black people isn’t widely recognised as racist as such, but if a black person got called that, odds are they would be offended and think “I’m not a frigging paint by numbers.”
There are also a high number of mixed race celebrities in this world and fame doesn’t prevent them having their own mixed race experiences.
Halle Belle recently told Lesley O’Toole how her White Liverpudlian mother Judith met her Black GI father Jerome, when he was stationed in England. She moved to America to marry him and they settled in Cleveland, Ohio. Initially, Berry’s parents lived in a black neighbourhood until Halle was four. However around this time they separated and Halle’s mother moved her and her sister Heidi to a white neighbourhood. ‘When we lived in the black neighbourhood, we weren’t liked because my mother was white. In the white neighbourhood, they didn’t like me because I was black. That was the beginning of my trying to be what I thought people wanted to be.’
In this excerpt from her autobiography, Catch A Fire, Melanie Brown (Scary Spice from the Spice Girls) tells the world her thoughts on mixed-race. ‘I was lucky that my parents were so cool about race when I was growing up. They respected each other’s cultures and mixed them and were happy about it, which was rare. They taught me always to respect both Black and White people. I’ve since noticed that Mixed-Race kids can get really confused if there parents sway one way or the other and are prejudiced against White or Black, because they become alienated from one side or the other. It’s difficult because you’ve got your Black communities and you’ve got your White communities. There are Black churches, White churches, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim and other places of worship, but you don’t get anything officially for Mixed-Race people. I’m not saying that being Mixed-Race is a defined culture and has a history – well, it has got a history but it’s been taboo for a long time, because society has always been so divided. For centuries, Mixed-Race children were mainly associated with being products of rape, the result of forced encounters between masters and slaves on plantations. They were ignored, their existence swept under the carpet and they were part of a forgotten history. Things have changed now. We’re starting to mix more and you get people who are quarter this, a half that and a quarter something else, which is great. The only problem is that there are a lot of kids growing up who don’t feel they belong anywhere. Their identity isn’t black or white. I had problems knowing where I fitted in sometimes. I had Black friends and I also had White friends and some of my Black friends would be completely on the Black side dissing the Whites, while some of my White friends were completely on the White side and didn’t really know anything about the history of Black culture. They had no idea about all the suffering that had gone on. I was different to the other Mixed-Race kids at school because I never chose one side over the other. I got on with everyone and as a result I was called ‘Bounty’ – Black on the outside, White on the inside. I remember thinking, Why are they calling me that? My parents had Black friends and White friends and I spent time with my mum’s family and my dad’s family, so my life was properly mixed, even down to the music I heard at home – from Aswad to the Eurythmics’
John Conteh was born in Toxteth, Liverpool, to a Sierra Leone father and an Anglo-Irish mother. Frequently in trouble as a teenager, his father steered him towards boxing. On March 13th 1973, at the age of just 21, he won the European light heavy-weight title. He went on to win a string of titles including the WBC Light heavyweight title. John said in his autobiography, ‘My first realisation that I was different from my white mates came when I was making sand castles from some builders materials in the road, that’s how young I was.A drunk loomed over me and began kicking my castles over and called me some frightening names. The one that struck the most fearful chord in my child’s brain was half caste.I remember running indoors to my mother and demanding some kind of explanation. When she told the old man about it that night, he roared like a lion, shouting: ‘My children are not half of anything. They are full human beings.’
For footballer Curtis Davies it is important that people acknolwedge all of his racial identity.’I’m as much white as I am black,’ he says. ‘People have got to acknowledge that. My mum is white and I don’t want people to discount that.’ Curtis has an older half-brother who is white. ‘Every time we went to football people couldn’t believe we were brothers,’ he says. ‘They couldn’t take that I could be related to a white person.’ For Curtis Davies having a fluid identity can also raise difficult questions. ‘If I’m walking down the street with black mates, it’s cold and we’ve got our hoodies up, we are likely to get name-checked by the police. I’ve been with my white mates, same area, same hoodies and it’s never happened. The police don’t even look or slow down. I guess that’s another aspect about the split in my race,’ he says. Curtis is aghast at the idea of having to choose. ‘Choosing which room to go into?’ he says. ‘That’s like choosing who to save from a burning building, your mum or your dad.’
Manchester United’s Welsh International winger Ryan Giggs gave a remarkably frank interview in the French weekly L’Eqipe Magazine, when he publicly acknowledged his black heritage. ‘Most people do not know that my origins are African-Welsh, in fact only the people who are close to me and who count for me know my whole story. Looking at me from the outside, it is not very obvious, I know but half my family is black and I feel close to their culture and their colour. I am proud of my black roots and of the black blood that runs in my veins. I do not wish to hide my origins, nor do I seek to make it a subject of conversation. I am what I am.’
Growing up surrounded by white faces in Welwyn Garden City in Hertfordshire, English footballer David James was the only non-white child at his junior school. ‘I was called a coon and a black bastard,’ he says. ‘I lived with my white mum so I couldn’t go back to an ethnic home and relate the experience. At school I was asked if I was adopted. I got confused and I’d go home and ask my mum if I was divorced.’ David believes that there was a direct correlation between bullying because of his mixed-race background and his low self-esteem. ‘Trying to break records in goal was all about proving that I was valuable.’ David also had a problem with the term half caste saying:’Being described in fractions is like being seen as abstract parts. It was a subtle prejudice that I felt,’ he says, ‘but people always commented on pieces of me – my hair, my colour – no one ever said anything nice about the whole of me.’
Crystal Palace winger Jobi McAnuff grew up in north London with his Jamaican father and English mother. Jobi celebrates his fluid identity, but he admits that in football there are racial cliques. ‘From my experience I get seen as one of the ‘brothers’. You walk into the canteen and there’s a table of black boys and the white boys are up the other end, but I don’t see it as a negative. I’d like to think it’s easier for me to cross between groups, but my white friends at Palace still see me as black. People only see skin deep and society says I look more black than white.’
Actress Thandie Newton tells interviewers that one of her fondest memories is watching her mother get dressed in her traditional African garb because it taught her black pride. ‘It’s funny, but yes. I was recently talking to my brother about what it means to be black, and he gave me a quizzical look, as if to say, ‘Hey, this is a bit radical,’ because I was taking a very black stance. But he reminded me of how I used to feel- as neither white nor black, but as a bridge between both. Now I see myself as black. There is a side of me that would like to go back to how I used to feel. But then I was looking at my peers. Now I’m looking at the whole world.’
Lead singer of the Pussycat Dolls Nicole Scherzinger was born in Hawaii, her father is Filipino and her mother is Hawaiian and Russian but Nicole has had many people confuse her racial identity. ‘I’m Filipino-Russian-Hawaiian,’ she says, ‘but people think I’m from Pakistan.’ She may be a household name now but Nicole remembers how difficult it was as a mixed-race girl when she was first entering the entertainment industry. ‘A lot of people didn’t understand what my nationality was or what race I was. So, they were a little confused on how to cast me or what my place was. It was really confusing at first because people wanted me to be like the Puerto Rican girl, the sidekick, the Puerto Rican best friend. I’m like, I’m not Puerto Rican.’
England women’s striker Rachel Yankey grew up in west London with an English mother; her Ghanaian father did not live with them. Sometimes it is the small things about a mixed-race background that make the most impression. ‘I’ve been in a shop with my mum and they’ve looked at both of us and gone, ‘I can see you’re related’, and I’m thinking, ‘Why say that?’ Or hairdressers, that’s the most common one. I remember going to white hairdressers with my mum and they couldn’t cut it right, or they put the wrong products in.’ Rachel says she feels uncomfortable when people assume things about her because of how she looks. She tells the story of an African mother to a child who attends her coaching sessions. ‘She brought in some traditional African food for me and asked if I knew what it was. She wasn’t quizzing me, but I felt that being half-African I should know. It bothered me that I didn’t. I felt I had to explain. I said that my dad didn’t bring me up, I didn’t grow up eating African food.’ Rachel also says her feelings differ according to the colour of the people in the room. ‘When you go in the white room you know you’re different looking, but I’ve grown up with white people so that’s probably where I’d feel most comfortable. When you go in the black room you look similar but you don’t feel as comfortable inside. I’m happiest when I’m surrounded by a mix of people.’
In a forum on what it is like being mixed race, there were many different responses:
AutoMango: No different to being any other race really. in all of primary school there was just me and a black boy who were anything. there were half german twins but they’re still white. i think at that age and a bit older people think if your not white then you’re black, which of course im not-im neither, so you get the odd childish comments. “have you been painting with black paint today?”
Kiero: Being mixed race is all about having other people arguing about your identity, and the supposed “crisis” you suffer. Along with being labelled a “coconut” if you’re well-educated and articulate.
osg_2: being mixed is a different experiencce still becos lots of ppl think ur confused or in sum way special, iv had lots of ppl sayin 2 me i wish i was mixed-race. But a bad thing is dat alot of (black) people think that mixed-race ppl thinkk there 2 nyc an r skets/slags/hoes/easy. I dnt lyk dese views
korlebu: Good points – I genuinely support France, Ghana and England in major tournaments as they have made me the individual I am
– I have the social and interpersonal skills to adapt into black or white environments (and other environments for that matter)
– My white side (mother) has done what my black side (father) was unfortunate enough not to do. Send myself and 4 other sibblings to top schools and university (cambridge etc). (Father well educated in Ghana but could only get a job as postman in UK)
– Have inherited stronger physical attributes from black side as have my 4 other sibblings (some may argue this, but science will argue my point)
– I represent how far black and white culture have come from our darkest days
– On a lighter note, sooooo many girls (especially black girls) want to have my children! Seriously, I have a queue.
Bad points
– When we lived in Ghana, we were called ‘obroni’ – white people by the black mainstream. When we came to UK, we were called black by the white mainstream.
– Black people see you as cousins or outcasts and white people see you quite simply as black or are so uneducated on the matter that they think mixed is just black but a different shade.
– Despite most mixed race (including myself) people saying to themselves that they are neither black or white but individuals, the truth is that since the caveman days we have always sought a group in society to belong to and as long as mixed race are not recognised on a more ‘official’ basis as whites and blacks are the question will always remain
Milk Maroon: Well being mixed race, it’s generally having your parents from two very different ethnical and/or cultural background. Sometimes you have to deal with the issues it can generate, sometimes you’re lucky enough to get to know both parts and cultures you’re made of.
Generally, I believe we’re more a product of our environment. That’s why you can “look black” but not relate to Blacks… There are numerous of examples, this one is one among many.
BenS: I was never told I was any race as an infant, I always knew I was mixed so in general my me being mixed isn’t an issue because I’m just me. What I dislike is the perception people have of mixed race people. Things like if a mixed race person has a white mother, then the perception is she must ugly, fat, working class etc. If a mixed race person has a white parent, he must also be ugly, but also a wimp. I also dislike the fact mixed race people are in general viewed as having identity issues, and that a well grounded mixed race person see’s themselves as black. And that mixed race people who are brought up by a single white parent, think they are white, and are somehow racist towards black people. The sad thing is these racist stereotypes are mainly things black people wish to be true. I would say these are the general stereotypes of what it’s supposed to be like to be mixed race. They only stereotype I fit is that from the age of 4yrs old I didn’t grow up with my black father, so the stereotype of growing up with a single white mother (though a very beautiful and middle class one) is true for me. But from my own experience, I me being mixed race isn’t an issue unless I’m around black people who have these “what are you” attitude which which I find very offensive. Though it’s wrong to presume every black person has that attitude. The black and white view of mixed race people as a whole I guess is from what I read online and tv documentaries etc is, that white people don’t wish to admit we are part of their “pure” culture. And that black people want to control use and have use deny our European side.
Born to a Nigerian father and White mother, Sir Keith Ajegbo is a key figure in education in Britain, as a former headmaster and author of the report to the Secretary of State for Education and Science on diversity and citizenship within the school curriculum. In a post for the Mixedness & Mixing website which gives new perspectives on mixed-race Britons, he said “The spectrum of being mixed race is extremely wide. It is dependent on the particular racial mix, on location and a range of other factors. However a very crucial component to mixed race children belonging and feeling whole has to be the attitude of their parents. My unresearched observation is that if parents are sensitive to their child being mixed race and are prepared to work together on the issues that might arise in terms of identity and belonging then this makes a considerable difference. I expect it also makes a difference if the family is together and both races are part of that family experience. The biggest psychological issue for me was being part of a white family with very little contact with the black side of my family. While my white family were very good to me they treated me as if I was white but had, rather accidentally, black skin. My grandmother would never allow black people into her house because of the trouble caused by my mother’s marriage. I remember my mother telling me to pull my cap on so people couldn’t see my hair and crying when my aunt referred to my curly hair. As a result I have always felt an element of being outside both races and of being inauthentic. There are geographical contexts. It is probably easier to be mixed race in London, which is increasingly multi cultural, than Bradford and other cities where Trevor Phillips has talked of the country ‘sleepwalking to segregation.’ Nor is it easy to be ‘the only black in the village’. One way in which being mixed race has determined my life is that I couldn’t move out of London because I imagine I would not feel comfortable. It is also true that the nature of a person’s mixedness make a difference. There are different issues for children of mixed African Caribbean or African and white heritage which is quite common in some urban areas to children of Asian/white heritage. Class makes a difference. A purely personal observation is seeing working class mixed race pupils moving towards black youth cultures and middle class mixed race pupils moving towards white. In terms of schooling and neighbourhoods working class pupils often come into far greater contact with pupils from other cultures. This is exacerbated by white middle class flight. I have often felt disturbed by TV satires around working class culture that imply a mongrel society. While some aspects of being mixed race are easier as the society becomes more at ease with race and difference, mixed race children are still likely to be at the sharp end of tensions and prejudice. An issue for me, which I expect is still there, is for mixed race children to have to listen to prejudices voiced by one or other of their races against the other one. This can create a real sense of dislocation and being an outsider. One of my great fears as a child, which has recurred through my life, was of a great war between white and black in which I could find no haven on either side.”
The media are also paying a lot more attention to the mixed race ethnicity. In a 2006 article for The Guardian newspaper, Laura Smith talked being mixed race: “Aged seven, I had the dubious distinction of being the only girl with one pink and one brown parent at my north London primary school. Although rarely intentionally unkind – apart from the little boy who called me poo in the school playground when the mood took him – my all-white classmates never let me forget that I was not like them. They asked me what it felt like to be black and touched my hair uninvited. In turn, I cut off my curls as gifts to satisfy their curiosity and told them that where my mum came from they cleaned their teeth by chewing on sticks. Nearly 25 years on, much has changed. The last national census counted 680,000 mixed race people, accounting for 1.2% of the overall population and nearly 15% of the ethnic minority population – and that is widely believed to be an underestimate. Suddenly, our image is everywhere, projected on posters selling Marks & Spencer’s bikinis or sofas for DFS. Mixed-race people have become the acceptable face of ethnic minorities for advertisers and programme makers. We are sufficiently exotic for viewers and consumers to recognise as “other”, and therefore a handy shorthand for diversity without the potential alienation associated with using somebody too black, too different, too dangerous. And yet there is an inconsistency. Despite our growth in numbers and our incredible visibility, we are utterly absent from any public debate on race. We appear to be the elephant in the room: obvious to anybody living in a large British city yet invisible at a government level. Take the current discussion surrounding multiculturalism. The fact that people are increasingly falling in love, or simply in lust, and having children across a so-called racial divide is an inconvenient truth that challenges the government’s notion of neat “communities” of black, white or Asian people.” [to read the full article, see the links at the bottom of this post]
Being mixed race is very different from other any other race and has both its advantages and disadvantages. I believe however that as this ethnicity grows and becomes more common, eventually being mixed race will become as normal as being Black or Asian or White and perhaps my future mixed race grandchildren will have completely different experiences to myself, just as I have had different experiences to people like Sir Keith Ajegbo who grew up in the 1950s and 60s.
Information from:
Melanie Brown’s autobiography Catch A Fire

Thought Black People Had It Tough? Try Being Untouchable.

Living in the West, when I hear about discrimination I think of gender, race, religion and even age. One word that doesn’t come to mind is caste but for an estimated 250 million people worldwide, caste discrimination is a serious problem. A caste is a combined social system of occupation, endogamy (marriage within a specific ethnic group), culture, social class, and political power. According to UNICEF, discrimination based on caste is prevalent mainly in parts of Asia and Africa.

The Indian caste system is comprised of four different castes, and outcasted social groups. Caste barriers have mostly broken down in large cities, though they persist in rural areas of the country, where 72% of India’s population resides. In some rural areas and small towns, the caste system is still very rigid. The Government of India has officially documented castes and sub-castes, primarily to determine those deserving reservation (positive discrimination in education and jobs) through the census. The Indian reservation system, though limited in scope, relies entirely on quotas. The Government lists consist of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.The caste-based reservations in India have led to widespread protests, such as the 2006 Indian anti-reservation protests, with many complaining of reverse discrimination against the forward castes (the castes that do not qualify for the reservation). Many view negative treatment of forward castes as socially divisive and equally wrong.
Independent India has witnessed a considerable amount of violence and hate crimes motivated by caste. Various incidents of violence against Dalits have been reported from many parts of India. Dalit is a self-designation for a group of people traditionally regarded as of lower class and unsuitable for making personal relationships. Dalits are a mixed population of numerous caste groups all over South Asia, and speak various languages.According to a report by Human Rights Watch, “Dalits and indigenous peoples (known as Scheduled Tribes or adivasis) continue to face discrimination, exclusion, and acts of communal violence. Laws and policies adopted by the Indian government provide a strong basis for protection, but are not being faithfully implemented by local authorities.”
What disturbed me most when I was researching the violence against Dalits in India was the number of massacres, the latest one being the Kherlanji massacre in 2006. On September 29, 2006, four members of the Bhotmange family belonging to the Dalit underclass were slaughtered in Kherlanji, a small village in Bhandara district of Maharashtra. The women of the family, Surekha and Priyanka, were paraded naked in public then allegedly gang-raped before being murdered. Although initially ascribed by the media and by the Human Rights Watch to upper castes, the criminal act was actually carried out by Kunbi caste (classified as Other Backward Classes by Government of India) farmers for having opposed the requisition of the Dalit land to have a road built over it.
The Nepalese caste system, like the Indian caste system, is highly complex and continues the traditional system of social stratification of Nepal. The castes of Nepal have been placed into 5 hierarchies with the following order of precedence:
  • Thagadhari, (Wearer of holy cord)
  • Matwali
  • Namasyane Matwali (Non-enslavable alcohol-drinkers)
  • Masyane Matwali (Enslavable alcohol drinkers)
  • Pani nachalne choichoto halnu naparne, (Impure but touchable castes)
  • Pani nachalne chiochoti halnu parne, (Impure and Untouchable castes)
The supreme caste communities make ornaments, weapons pottery and others. The castes have different names: Kamis (Iron-smiths), Sunars (Gold-smiths), Lohars (Iron smiths), Vishwakarmas (V.K.), Sobh, Snehi Nepali, etc. They have been named after the professions they are found to be engaged in. For instance, one who is engaged in works related to gold is a Sonar; one who constructs a house or makes pots is an Od; the person who makes things out of copper is a Tamta.
However, Nepalese society is clearly split into touchables and untouchables as touchables have no marital relation with them, and do not allow them to enter their houses. The situation of caste-based untouchability existing in the country depends heavily on what region of the country you are in. Untouchability exists in its extreme form especially in the hills and mountains of the remote western region. Untouchable castes have been prohibited from their entrance into temples and other public places. For instance, the untouchables are not allowed to enter the fair held annually at Dehimandau in Baitadi district and open stalls. They have to sit outside restaurants and wash eating utensils. At many places there also exists the practice of sprinkling water for purification. Milk and milk products are not given to the untouchables to drink and eat.Untouchable boys and girls are discriminated even at public schools. They have to use separate pots for drinking water. They have also to sit separately in the class as ink is defiled with their touch.
With the advent of democracy in 1950, social discriminations started breaking down not because of any legal provisions but because of the high caste people’s own initiatives. However, even this change could not abolish untouchability. Though public places were opened to low caste people in some places, the situation remained unchanged to a large extent. There has been made a legal sanction in the civil code against untouchability; however, it has turned out to be meaningless since its violation is not liable to any specific penalty.
In West Africa, the Osu caste system in Nigeria and southern Cameroon, can be traced back to an indigenous religious belief system, practiced within the Igbo nation. It is the belief of many Igbo traditionalists that the Osus are people historically owned by deities, and are therefore considered to be a ‘living sacrifice’, an outcaste, untouchable and sub-human. People regarded as modern-day Osu in Igboland are descendants of individuals who volunteered and were sacrificed to the various gods. These fore-fathers pledged themselves and their descendants to these gods. They enjoyed protection and privileges but were segregated from ordinary people. Osu people married, fraternized and socialized among themselves. This practice continues to this day. An ordinary Igbo person would not marry or permit any of his relations to marry an Osu person. In the few instances where this has happened, the non-Osu who married the Osu became infested and was from then on regarded as Osu.
The East African caste system in Rwanda, Burundi and eastern Congo it is known as ubuhake. The Tutsi, who comprise about 15% of the population of these areas were the ruling, Cattle-owning caste. Below them were the Hutu, the farmers who made up about 80% of the population. Fewer than 3% of the population are Twa or Pygmies. During the German authorative control over Rwanda and Burundi, the authorities reinforced the system by employing Tutsis in hegemonic (dominating, leaders) roles. The Belgian colonialists who succeeded them after World War I continued this policy, instituting ‘ethnic’ identity cards. After independence, tensions intensified. In 1972, Tutsis were responsible for a wholesale massacre of Hutus. In the 1990s, Hutus responded with counter-massacres. See our posts on the Rwandan Genocide to find out more (in the posts for Rwanda under ‘around the world…’).
While many of the discrimination towards ‘untouchables’ and other ‘low’ castes is similar to the discrimination of ethnic minorities under white people in the west, the disturbing difference is that the discrimination against so-called ‘untouchables’ IS STILL HAPPENING. Imagine it. Martin Luther King’s dream never happened. Equality never happened. There are still signs outside shops saying “No Dogs, No Negroes”. For that to still exist in the 21st century would be unacceptable and unthinkable so why is it any different for castes? I personally think a lot of it is ignorance. We simply don’t know what’s going on. Even I am guilty. I had heard the term ‘untouchable’ many times but, never knowing what it was, assumed it was an insulting name for people with leprosy or something like that. I knew a lot about the Rwandan genocide but never realised that it wasn’t just a one-off situation. This post only contains a raindrop of the ocean of countries across the globe with castes and caste systems.
It can be easy to shrug and say ‘what can we do?’ but something CAN be done. There have been many countries like Korea, Hawai, Japan, Spanish America and England that used to have castes systems and don’t any longer. There are also countries like Bali that have castes systems but there are no ‘untouchables’ and there is mobility within the castes so one family can contain many castes and they can marry one another. This discrimination is wrong and the first step to beating it is telling everyone its out there, its wrong and we aren’t going to accept it. Tell some friends, work with the charities and touch an untouchable.
Information from:

What does Gender Equality mean to you?


Today is Women’s Equality day in the USA and while gender equality is something very important to us at breaking perceptions, it is a phrase that can mean different things to different people. This post looks at what different organisations, people and religions say about gender equality but more importantly we want comments to hear from you what you think gender equality means and whether you agree with the other views shown on here.

According to the wikipedia article, “Gender equality (also known as gender equity, gender egalitarianism, or sexual equality) is the goal of the equality of the genders or the sexes, stemming from a belief in the injustice of myriad forms of gender inequality.”
UNICEF defines gender equality as “levelling the playing field for girls and women by ensuring that all children have equal opportunity to develop their talents.”
The United Nations Population Fund declared gender equality “first and foremost, a human right.”
For Unifem “it is the fundamental right of every woman to live a life free from discrimination and violence”.
The United Nations Millennium Project claims, “Every single Goal is directly related to women’s rights, and societies where women are not afforded equal rights as men can never achieve development in a sustainable manner.”
According to Gary Younge of the Guardian newspaper in Britain, “Black presidents and women MPs do not alone mean equality and justice” and he argues that “The relationship between identity, representation and equality is neither inevitable nor irrelevant, but occasionally contradictory and always complex.”
In an article for the Independent newspaper in Britain, E Jane Dickson said that “Women behaving like men does not mean equality”. She says that “It’s not right that men sexually and economically exploit women in foreign countries. But turning the tables is not in itself constructive.”
Pelle Billing, who blogs about women’s liberation beyond feminism, says that “Assuming that equality means sameness is inherently problematic since if you want men and women to make exactly the same career choices, family choices and lifestyles choices, then you are basically trying to fit individuals into your own preconceived notion of reality.” Instead, “Equality between the sexes simply means that men and women have equal rights, responsibilities and opportunities.”
During a talk to Ithaca College on Islam, Women and Equality, Asma Barlas said the Qu’ran “designates women and men each other’s “guides” (awliya) and establishes love and mutuality as the basis of marriage.”
In the essay “Equality, Submission And The Role Of Women”, Allan Turner says that “Equality and subordination are not contradictions. The Bible teaches that, as image-bearers of the divine nature, the female and male are totally equal. It teaches, therefore, that she is totally equal with the male in her humanity. Furthermore, the Bible teaches that the female is not a second-class citizen of the kingdom of God. It teaches, in fact, that she is totally equal in her access to the salvation that takes place in Christ. Nevertheless, the Bible emphatically teaches that the female role is to be one of submission”
For me, Robyn, gender equality means that my gender is considered unimportant in my ability to do anything. Like feminists, I distinguish between sex and gender and accept that, being the female sex, peeing standing up and growing facial hair are things I will never be able to do as equally well as men. Gender however, is what my role is considered to be in society and I see no reason why a woman cannot do just as much as a man in society, whether in terms of economy & earning money, or careers, or raising children. I believe if there is to be gender equality then not only do women need have equal rights and opportunities as men, but men need to be given equal rights with women on things as well, for example giving longer paternity leave. In places like the USA and most European countries however, where women do for the most part have equal legal and political rights as men, gender equality is a state of mind. Its all very well you legally having a law that women can be stockbrokers if all male stockbrokers have the belief that women could never be stockbrokers.
What does gender equality mean to you?